hiiiiii
Can you give the answer of this picture
What is it
Comment the answer
SHREE RAM JANMABHOOMI POOJAN please like and subscribe
'%20x='0'%20y='0'%20height='100%25'%20width='100%25'%20xlink%3Ahref='data%3Aimage/jpeg;base64,/9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQAAAQABAAD/2wBDABALDA4MChAODQ4SERATGCgaGBYWGDEjJR0oOjM9PDkzODdASFxOQERXRTc4UG1RV19iZ2hnPk1xeXBkeFxlZ2P/2wBDARESEhgVGC8aGi9jQjhCY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2NjY2P/wAARCAAGAAgDASIAAhEBAxEB/8QAFQABAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAb/xAAbEAACAgMBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQIRAxIhIv/EABQBAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAL/xAAWEQEBAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABABH/2gAMAwEAAhEDEQA/ALRzy+Y31O72fQALIK3/2Q=='%3E%3C/image%3E%3C/svg%3E)
 SHREE RAM JANMABHOOMI POOJAN on 5 agust 2020 A ll trust members called a meeting And because of CORONA virus only few People will be invited (250 people) I also want to go and see the bhoomi pujan but because of corona virus I cannot go there. The legal fight began in 1885, when Mahanth Raghubar Das filed a suit (No. 61/280) against Secretary of State for India in Council in the civil court of Faizabad. In his suit, Das claimed that he was a mahanth and was located at the chabutra in the outer courtyard and should be permitted to construct a temple there. The suit was dismissed. In 1886, a Civil Appeal (No. 27) was filed against the 1885 judgment. District Judge of Faizabad, FER Chamier, decided to visit the spot before passing the order. He later dismissed the appeal. second Civil Appeal (No. 122) was filed against this dismissal, which was also dismissed by the court of J...
